ComplianceSeptember 10, 2025

Specialize or generalize: The future of internal auditing

The best symphony orchestras include principal players who excel at their string instrument and can play difficult solos with confidence. They also have ensemble players who can play in all parts of an orchestral string section and easily blend their sound supporting the overall performance. The conductor needs both principal and ensemble players to create a unified, balanced performance. Like symphony conductors, internal audit leaders need to determine how to best organize their teams with specialists (like Cybersecurity Auditors) and generalists who can execute across a variety of audits. Finding the right mix is essential for a cohesive and efficient internal audit team as risks, regulations, and technology continue to rapidly evolve.

This debate is fueled by the fact that today’s business environment is very complicated, with a focus on Artificial Intelligence (AI), cybersecurity, sustainability, and digital transformation. The Institute of Internal Auditors (The IIA) and the Global Internal Audit Standards demonstrate how important it is to have both deep knowledge of a subject and a wide range of risk coverage. Finding the right balance is important for your organization’s ability to identify and manage risk. This article explores the roles and trade-offs between audit specialists and generalists, utilizing industry guidance and practical examples to help you find the ideal composition for your internal audit function.

The rise of the audit specialist

As organizations face increasing levels of complex risks, the need for highly qualified specialists on internal audit teams has never been greater. Organizations understand that a one-size-fits-all approach to internal audit is not always the right answer. This shift has further opened the way for the audit specialist, whose role is to deal with the most difficult and technical risk areas of today.

What is an audit specialist?

An audit specialist specializes in a particular area, such as cybersecurity, information technology, sustainability, and more recently, AI. The audit specialist brings extensive technical knowledge and advanced skills related to their designated field, in contrast to the traditional internal auditor who may cover a wide range of business processes. The rise of the audit specialist is not a coincidence, as it is a direct response to the fact that risk domains are becoming more complicated and closely watched.

There are several factors that are causing this trend to spike. First, regulatory bodies around the world have made rules about data privacy, information security, and sustainability reporting stricter. For example, the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and the updated standards from the IIA all demand a level of technical proficiency that generalists may not possess. Cybersecurity, in particular, has become of paramount importance. Because of the rise of ransomware, data breaches, and third-party risks, organizations need internal auditors who understand network architectures, encryption, incident response, and cyber frameworks like NIST and ISO 27001.

Audit specialists often have degrees in fields like computer science and certifications like Certified Information Systems Auditor (CISA), Certified Internal Auditor (CIA), or Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP). They also stay up to date on new regulations and technologies. With this level of knowledge, they are more equipped to spot subtle risks, assess control effectiveness, and provide assurance that would not be possible with a more generalized background.

When to consider an audit generalist approach

If your organization faces a diverse range of risks or operates in a rapidly changing environment, it may be particularly advantageous to use audit generalists.

The value of audit generalists in diverse risk environments

Audit generalists are professionals with a broad base of knowledge across multiple business functions and risk areas. The generalist has greater flexibility because they can switch between operational audits, financial controls, and compliance reviews and evaluate emerging risks. Using generalists often works best in audit teams with limited resources or organizations where the risk environment is constantly changing.

Generalists are proficient at connecting different risk domains. They excel at finding system problems or process inefficiencies - looking at things from different angles - which a specialist with a narrower focus might miss. Generalists are often good at making connections across the organization and being trusted advisors who can turn complex audit results into practical recommendations for stakeholders who may be less technical.

Audit generalist vs. audit specialist: Understanding the trade-offs

Each approach has benefits as well as drawbacks. When you have an audit specialist on your team, you can be sure that the audits over these technical areas will be complete and more credible with regulators and senior management. On the other hand, too much specialization can create silos, limit knowledge sharing, and possibly make it more difficult to deal with new or unexpected risks that are not in their area of expertise.

On the other hand, audit generalists are flexible and cover a lot of ground, which is essential as organizations are facing more risks. But they might not have the technical know-how to evaluate very specialized domains like cybersecurity or ESG. In these cases, generalists might overlook critical vulnerabilities or misjudge the effectiveness of controls.

Advantages of specialization in internal audit

There are several benefits to specializing. Audit specialists are ready to handle audit areas that are becoming more technical, such as AI, IT security, data privacy, anti-money laundering, and sustainability. Their expertise allows them to look more closely at the related control environment and framework, compare them to industry best practices, and give management specific recommendations. In highly regulated industries, like healthcare or financial services, having audit specialists can help organizations demonstrate compliance, pass regulatory inspections, and avoid costly penalties.

Specialists also improve the reputation of the internal audit function with the board, audit committee, and external stakeholders. Stakeholders, management, and regulators may have more confidence in the audit process because the specialist can effectively speak the language of these technical areas.

Benefits of generalization for internal audit teams

Generalists add value because they are adaptable and know how to make the best use of the available resources. They are good at handling shifting priorities and filling in gaps as risk profiles change. In smaller organizations or audit teams with limited resources, generalists are often the core members of the team. They can look at risk interdependencies from a wide range of angles, identify new or unforeseen issues, and recommend improvements that will have an impact on more than one area of the organization.

Generalists are also essential for making plans for the future and developing teams. Because of their diverse audit backgrounds, they are great at serving as mentors for new team members, helping with cross-training initiatives, and taking on leadership roles when the organization needs change.

View a demo

Finding the right balance for your audit team is essential for effective risk management

Having the right blend of skills on your audit team allows you to effectively align with your business strategy and your organization’s business risks. A well-balanced team delivers stronger insights and more comprehensive risk coverage.

Hybrid models: Combining specialists and generalists

Increasingly, organizations realize that the best internal audit teams do not choose between specialists and generalists; they use both. With a hybrid team structure, you can put specialists with deep expertise in charge of areas that are high-risk or high complexity, while generalists make sure that all business processes and emerging risks are covered. This approach makes the most of resources and allows for flexible, risk-based auditing.

Co-sourcing and technology as a solution

Co-sourcing can also help cover critical skill gaps and provide new vantage points when particular expertise is required. This model provides the opportunity for internal teams to work side-by-side with external partners and is a smaller leap from the internal options that is more readily adaptable to workplace changes in risk.

In hybrid models, collaboration is key. Regular knowledge-sharing sessions, cross-functional project teams, and joint audit planning help break down barriers and promote ongoing learning. These teams can best support this when they use the right technology. For example, they can work more collaboratively using an audit management platform, like TeamMate+ Audit, which offers workflow automation, integrated analytics, and collaboration tools that cut down on manual work and let auditors focus on higher-value activities. At the same time, AI and machine learning can help these teams identify patterns, flag unusual events, and support continuous monitoring, which brings generalist and specialist skills even closer together.

How to build the internal audit team your organization needs

To build an effective, high-performing internal audit team, you need to take a good look at your organization’s strategy, risk profile, and regulatory environment. Here are some useful steps to help you get started:

Map your risk universe and identify skill requirements.

Use your risk assessment process to identify areas that are more complex or that management and regulators are paying more attention to, such as AI, cybersecurity, ESG, or third-party risk. Determine the knowledge level of your existing staff in each area and whether specialist skills are required.

Assess your current team’s capabilities and gaps.

Review the certifications, experience, and learning needs of your current team members. Utilize resources such as the IIA’s competency framework and TeamMate Audit Benchmark to identify your team’s strengths and areas requiring improvement.

Design a team structure that aligns with your needs.

Think about whether a specialist, generalist, or hybrid approach is best for the organization and the risks it faces. In large, complex organizations, a mix of both is usually best. In smaller organizations, generalists may be the norm, with support through co-sourcing or consulting partners as needed.

Invest in continuous learning and upskilling.

Give your audit team access to specialized training, certifications, and industry resources to help them develop and perform their work more effectively. Encourage team members to learn new skills and take on different tasks to make them more adaptable and resilient.

Leverage audit technology to maximize impact.

Use audit management platforms that let your team work together in real-time, automate repetitive tasks, and help you make decisions based on data. These tools empower both specialists and generalists to deliver greater value.

Monitor and adapt.

Regularly reevaluate your team’s structure as your organization evolves, risks change, and new regulations go into effect. Be open to changing your plans and moving resources as needed.

Balance delivers the best performance in internal audit

Just like an orchestra needs a good mix of principal and ensemble players to create great music, your internal audit function needs a good mix of audit specialists and generalists to work well. The future of internal audit does not depend on choosing one path. Instead, it depends on finding a balance between using deep domain knowledge when it is needed and relying on broad, flexible skills for full risk coverage. Now is the time to evaluate your team’s makeup, find new ways for them to work together, and make sure your internal audit team is set up for long-term success.

Subscribe below to receive monthly Expert Insights in your inbox

Scott Madenburg Headshot
Founder at ARC∙Hybrid
Scott Madenburg is a leading market advisor and subject matter expert in audit, risk, and compliance with over 20 years of experience.
Back To Top