Fragmented data has been a barrier to progress, care delivery, and professional communication throughout healthcare, and the life sciences industry is no exception. Many experts see developing an “integrated ecosystem,” fueled by a central source of data, as key to aligning data initiatives with business goals, establishing clear governance, and supporting cross-functional collaboration for life sciences organizations.
In the webinar “From Centralized Content to Personalized Engagement: Delivering Consistent, Insightful Messaging Across Patients and Providers,” four life sciences experts took a closer look at the benefits of centralizing resources and fostering collaboration across internal teams and with external stakeholders and patients.
“The goal at the end is always to make sure that we're getting the most effective treatments to our patients,” said Audrey Vandervelde, PhD, Director of Medical Communications and Scientific Training at Takeda. “And the best way we can do that is by being consistent in our communications.”
Breaking down information silos builds trust with HCPs
That consistency begins by fighting data fragmentation and breaking down information silos through centralized platforms that unify various functions within an organization, Vandervelde explained. She referred to it as “making sure that everybody is singing from the same song sheet.”
What that means, she clarified, is “essentially you have a mechanism for integrating datasets that come from a bunch of different sources. So, whether it's clinical, commercial, or RWE [real-world evidence], you have one single source of truth, reducing your chance of having errors from things like manual data transfers.”
That centralization helps improve efficiency for various workflows, including:
- Accelerating content creation.
- Streamlining medical, legal, and regulatory reviews.
- Supporting omnichannel approaches and scalability.
- Accelerating timelines and reducing confusion surrounding investigator-sponsored studies.
One of the primary consequences of siloed systems is “a breakdown of trust and efficiency,” said Kelley Lu, Associate Director of Global Medical Affairs - Oncology at Gilead Sciences. “When you have disjointed messaging and disjointed information, this creates confusion both internally and externally.”
Once an organization has confused or created complications for healthcare professionals (HCPs), it can be difficult to regain their confidence, added Priya Londhe, PhD, Director of Medical Affairs Research at Gilead Sciences. “I could not stress more the importance of centralized communication. Because you have multiple people talking to these HCPs, and if the message gets lost in translation or there is a different message that gets delivered, the company overall loses its credibility as a trusted partner.”
In addition to losing credibility with HCPs, Londhe noted that the messaging leaders within life sciences organizations will “bear the brunt of miscommunication” with frustrated colleagues internally as well.
There are other internal benefits, said Melanie Conboy, PharmD, MPH, Lead Product Manager, Pharmacy and Health Technology Solutions, at Wolters Kluwer Health. When a company brings together professionals of varying backgrounds, including clinical and nonclinical, centralized solutions and data help “reduce some of that variation that's derived from those different professional backgrounds and perspectives, to get everybody on the same page at a foundational level, and promote standards of care across disciplines.”