HealthJune 24, 2026

AI literacy: The missing link in digital health tech

Key Takeaways

  • Healthcare has abundant data, but generative AI only adds value when users have the AI literacy to interpret and apply its outputs responsibly.
  • Blindly trusting or misapplying AI outputs compromises clinical decision-making, risking healthcare consumer and patient safety and eroding ecosystem trust.
  • Digital health companies must incorporate AI literacy directly into product workflows to support governance, consistency, and trust.
With AI shaping healthcare decisions, AI literacy is the line between insight and error. Digital health tech can help clinicians and patients use AI insights productively and responsibly within real-world workflows.

The healthcare industry has never lacked information. From electronic health records (EHRs) to imaging, genomics, and patient-generated data, the healthcare system is saturated with inputs. Many see generative AI (GenAI) as a solution to synthesize this information overload and data complexity.

But synthesis alone isn’t enough. According to a survey by IBM, nearly half of executives believe their employees lack the necessary skill to implement AI technology at scale, and the Center for Governance of AI estimates 6.1 million American workers are both exposed to AI in their jobs and ill-equipped to adapt to it. Nonetheless, interest in and pressure to implement AI-enabled solutions keeps growing.

Thus, healthcare leadership involved in procurement, compliance, and healthcare AI governance are now prioritizing AI literacy, including improving basic user skills and knowledge of AI-enabled healthcare solutions. At the same time, this shift is signaling something deeper to digital health tech developers: That the success of AI in healthcare will depend not just on model performance, but on how effectively end users understand, interpret, and apply its outputs. This presents digital health tech developers with both an opportunity and mandate to provide advanced solutions that not only deliver reliable, secure AI, but also embed AI literacy directly into the user experience.

Understanding AI risk and its impact on patient and health consumer trust and outcomes

Healthcare AI doesn’t just deliver information; it shapes decisions and helps influence actions.

“Decisions can be altered by presenting information,” explains Dr. Peter Bonis, Chief Medical Officer at Wolters Kluwer Health. “About 30% of the time, healthcare professionals will change their decision if they're presented with information at or near the point of care. So, if that information in some way is faulty, it can lead to at least suboptimal care, if not impair patient safety as well.”

When AI-generated outputs are misunderstood, misapplied, or blindly trusted, the consequences are amplified. This makes GenAI tools difficult for healthcare procurement teams to evaluate, Bonis says, because they are “evolving as they are being integrated into the workforce,” and it is often uncertain how they will ultimately fare in terms of clinical reliability.

Watch Dr. Peter Bonis discuss how – when AI shapes decisions – trust is on the line.

Watch Now

The need for shared AI literacy across healthcare professionals, consumers, and patients

Digital health tech organizations are increasingly recognizing that AI literacy in healthcare must be built simultaneously across three groups:

  • Clinicians and care teams: Must integrate AI into shared decision-making without compromising judgment.
  • Patients and healthcare consumers: Must feel confident that AI enhances — not replaces — care. According to a recent survey by CHAI, 93% of consumers had at least one concern about use of AI in healthcare, and more than 50% said it makes them trust healthcare less.
  • Digital health tech organizations and health system administrators: Must balance empowering clinical teams with security concerns, like compliance, governance, and accountability. The average cost of an AI-related security breach in healthcare in 2025 was over $7.4 million.

Without shared AI literacy across all three stakeholder groups, even well-governed AI systems can fail at the point of use.

In a recent Becker’s Healthcare discussion featuring leaders from Cleveland Clinic, Seattle Children’s, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Nuvance Health, and UChicago Medicine, a shared challenge came into focus: AI adoption is outpacing AI literacy. Rather than treating this as a compliance issue alone, these organizations are reframing it as a usability, transparency, and education gap — one that digital health technology must help close.

From this discussion, three key points emerged for developers to consider:

  • Users will seek out general AI tools when existing solutions fall short: Despite the availability of enterprise-sanctioned tools, clinicians and staff are turning to shadow AI to meet immediate needs, signaling unmet demand and creating both risk and opportunity.
  • AI outputs can directly influence care decisions, for better or worse: Without clear context, validation, and guardrails, AI can shape decisions in ways users may not fully understand, particularly at the point of care. Sustainable governance depends on enabling — not restricting — responsible use.
  • Leading organizations are looking to guide safe adoption rather than attempting to control it: They are doing this by pairing oversight with education, transparency, and cross-functional collaboration.

For digital health companies, these signals reinforce a clear shift: AI literacy is not just a training challenge — it is a design challenge.

The bigger picture: AI literacy supports healthier ecosystems

AI literacy is not simply about improving individual decisions. It is about shaping entire ecosystems by:

  • Reducing variability in care.
  • Supporting workforce sustainability.
  • Enhancing consumer and patient engagement.
  • Strengthening system-wide trust.

Digital health tech companies are building AI-enabled experiences for users who may interpret outputs as professional advice or direction, not just information to consider. In order to combat “over-trust” in healthcare AI, developers must design AI-enabled experiences that build literacy into the workflow itself, using trusted clinical intelligence, medication context, and patient-appropriate education.

Model Context Protocol (MCP) helps support structured, repeatable AI processes, reduce variability, and strengthen trust. By creating a more scalable path for connecting AI agents to trusted clinical intelligence, it helps digital health companies move their solution outputs from generic synthesis toward context-aware guidance grounded in approved clinical content.

“When you can leverage technology to reduce complexity and administrative burdens, you create a better set of conditions for engagement and empathy,” explains Alex Tyrrell, PhD, Head of Advanced Technology and Chief Technology Officer of Wolters Kluwer. “That frees up the valuable time you need to develop meaningful relationships and shared understanding with patients and members.”

Digital health tech companies should treat shared AI literacy both as a requirement for their product and the wider healthcare ecosystem, building AI experiences that help clinicians, patients, and organizations move from raw information to responsible clinical intelligence.

AI-enabled content to support AI literacy goals

As digital health continues to evolve, the organizations that succeed will not be those with the most advanced AI — but those that can earn healthcare professional and consumer trust and develop and empower AI-literate users.

Speak to a specialist to learn more about AI-enabled content to support digital health technology workflow development.

Speak To A Specialist
Back To Top