In today’s healthcare ecosystem, the efficacy of medical decisions heavily hinges on laboratory test results, shaping nearly 70% of clinical decisions. Despite this, lab data is notoriously hard to work with. Failure to map or accurately interpret data poses multifaced risks, including compromised patient safety, gaps in care, and unreliable analytics.
Challenges in normalizing lab data
According to the CDC, 14 billion laboratory tests are ordered annually in the US. How do we convert this vast amount of lab data into a valuable resource? Our endeavor begins by understanding the complexities involved in tasks like mapping lab results to LOINC, which are more challenging than they might appear.
Lab data is notoriously messy and often not standardized to a terminology. The standard for lab data is LOINC (Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes), but normalizing lab data to LOINC is more complicated than it appears at first glance, for several reasons.
- LOINC contains more than just laboratory codes, including clinical observations, HIPAA documents, and standardized survey instruments.
- LOINC is constantly updating, releasing several versions per year.
- Lab results are made up of six axis — spanning what’s measured, where, and how— that all must be correct to achieve an accurate map.