Tax & AccountingComplianceJuly 02, 2025

Thin capitalisation 101: does Div 820 apply to you?

The thin capitalisation provisions in Div 820 of ITAA 1997 operate to prevent entities from reducing their Australian taxable income by funding their operations with excessive levels of debt and relatively little equity. If an entity is thinly capitalised (ie their debts exceed prescribed limits), all or part of their interest and similar expenses may be disallowed. Division 820 has been significantly reformed by Act No 23 of 2024. This article explains the main tests that currently apply.


Table of contents


Entities subject to thin capitalisation rules

Both inward investing entities (ie entities controlled by non-residents) and outward investing entities (ie Australian entities with offshore investments) may be subject to the thin capitalisation rules. Broadly speaking, Div 820 currently applies to:

  • general class investors – essentially entities that are neither authorised deposit-taking institutions (or ADIs, for the purposes of the Banking Act 1959) nor non-ADI financial entities. This broad concept captures most multinationals such as Australian entities carrying on business overseas, Australian entities controlled by foreign residents, as well as foreign entities having investments in Australia
  • non-ADI financial entities, including outward investors (financial), inward investors (financial) and inward investment vehicles (financial). Examples include finance companies, fund managers and investment funds, and
  • ADIs or, broadly speaking, banks. Specifically, these are inward investing entities (ADI) and outward investing entities (ADI).

Among other things, it does not apply to:

  • taxpayers and their associates whose total annual debt deductions do not exceed $2 million
  • outward investing Australian entities where the sum of their average Australian assets and those of its associates represent 90% or more of the sum of its average total assets (including those of the associates), or
  • certain special purpose entities established for the purposes of managing some or all of the economic risk associated with assets, liabilities or investments where at least 50% of its assets are funded by debt interests and the entity is an insolvency remote special purpose entity, eg securitisation entities.

Different tests apply to different entities

The application of relevant tests and rules to different categories of entities in Div 820 is summarised as follows and further explained below. If Div 820 applies, certain “debt deductions” of entities may be disallowed. Debt deductions are widely defined to include, broadly speaking, interest expenses, amounts in the nature of interest, or amounts economically equivalent to interests.

Test/Rules General class investors Non-ADI financial entities ADIs
Fixed ratio test
Group ratio test
Third-party debt test
Safe harbour debt/capital test
Worldwide gearing test
Arm’s length debt/capital test
Debt deduction creation rules in Subdiv 820-EAA

General class investors

A general class investor can choose either the fixed ratio test, the group ratio test or the third party debt test.

The fixed ratio test applies by default. The amount of debt deductions disallowed under this test is the amount by which “net debt deductions” exceeds the entity’s “fixed ratio earnings limit”, ie 30% of “tax EBITDA”. Tax EBITDA (or tax earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortisation) means, broadly, the entity’s taxable income or tax loss adding back deductions for interest, decline in value of assets and capital works. However, a special deduction in respect of amounts previously disallowed may be available. Further, entities may transfer excess tax EBITDA amounts to other eligible entities.

If an entity chooses the group ratio test, the amount of debt deductions disallowed is the amount by which net debt deductions exceeds the “group ratio earnings limit”, ie the entity’s “group ratio” multiplied by its tax EBITDA. Broadly speaking, an entity’s group ratio is the ratio of its group’s net third party interest expense to its group’s EBITDA for an income year.

If the third party debt test is chosen, all or part of debt deductions for the income year may be disallowed. The amount of debt deductions disallowed is the amount by which debt deductions exceeds the entity’s “third party earnings limit”. This test disallows debt deductions to the extent they exceed the entity’s debt deductions attributable to third party debt and which satisfy conditions in Subdiv 820-EAB.

Example

An Australian subsidiary of a US-based multinational borrows $10 million from its US parent company to fund its Australian operations. The annual interest expense on the loan amounts to $1.5 million. The entity’s tax EBITDA is $4 million, and its group ratio is 40%.

The entity is a general class investor, as it is neither a financial entity nor an ADI. By default, the fixed ratio test applies to limit net debt deductions to 30% of tax EBITDA. The maximum allowable deduction would be 30% of $4 million, ie $1.2 million. Accordingly, $300,000 of the $1.5 million interest expense would be denied.

The entity can elect to apply the group ratio test to allow higher deductions. With a 40% group ratio, the allowable deduction would be $1.6 million. Accordingly, the full $1.5 million interest could be deducted.

Theoretically, the third party debt test could be elected to allow deductions for interest on genuine third party debt. However, since the loan is from a related party (US parent), none of the $1.5 million would be deductible under this option.

Inward investing financial entities (non-ADI)

An inward investing financial entity (non-ADI) that is not also an outward investing financial entity (non-ADI) can choose to apply the third party debt test, in which case all or part of its debt deductions for the income year may be disallowed. The amount of debt deductions disallowed is the amount by which debt deductions exceed the entity’s third party earnings limit (see above).

If the entity does not choose the third party debt test and its “adjusted average debt” exceeds its “maximum allowable debt”, then all or a part of each debt deduction of the entity may be disallowed. The maximum allowable debt is the greater of the “safe harbour debt amount” or, if applicable, the “worldwide gearing debt amount”. The actual amount of the deduction disallowed is calculated under s 820-220.

Under the safe harbour debt test, the amount of debt used to finance the Australian investments is considered excessive when it is greater than that permitted by the safe harbour gearing limit of 1.5:1 with respect to an entity’s non-lending business. An on-lending rule operates to exclude any debt that is on-lent to third parties or used for similar financing activities. The application of this on-lending rule is limited by an additional safe harbour gearing ratio of 15:1 which applies to the entity’s total business. There are also special rules that result in higher allowable gearing ratios for entities that have assets which are allowed to be fully debt funded.

The worldwide gearing debt test does not apply to an inward investing financial entity (non-ADI) if its statement worldwide equity or assets (as defined) is nil or negative, or if audited consolidated financial statements do not exist. The calculation of the worldwide gearing test amount depends on the type of entity involved (ss 820-217 to 820-219; Subdiv 820-JA).

Outward investing financial entities (non-ADI)

Similarly, an outward investing financial entity (non-ADI) can choose to apply the third party debt test, in which case all or part of its debt deductions for the income year (to the extent that they are not attributable to its overseas permanent establishments) may be disallowed. Again, the amount of debt deductions disallowed is the amount by which debt deductions exceed the entity’s third party earnings limit (see above).

If the entity has not chosen the third party debt test and its “adjusted average debt” exceeds its “maximum allowable debt”, then all or a part of each debt deduction of the entity for the income year (to the extent that they are not attributable to its overseas permanent establishments) may be disallowed. The maximum allowable debt is the greater of the “safe harbour debt amount” and, if applicable, the “worldwide gearing debt amount”. The actual amount of the deduction disallowed is calculated under s 820-115.

The safe harbour limit is fundamentally the same as that described for inward investing financial entities (non-ADI). The limit takes account, however, of the amount and form of investment in the Australian non-ADI’s controlled foreign investments.

The worldwide gearing debt test for outward investing financial entities (non-ADI) allows an Australian entity with foreign investments to fund its Australian investments with gearing of up to 100% of the gearing of the worldwide group that it controls. However, this test is not available if the Australian entity is itself controlled by foreign entities.

Inward investing ADIs

An ADI’s debt deductions will be reduced where the equity capital used to fund the Australian operations is less than a minimum equity requirement.

The minimum amount of equity capital for an inward investing ADIs (ie foreign ADIs with Australian permanent establishments) is the lesser of:

  • the safe harbour capital amount, ie 6% of Australian risk-weighted assets, and
  • the arm’s length capital amount, ie a notional amount that represents what would reasonably be expected to have been the entity’s minimum arm’s length capital funding of its Australian business throughout the year.

Outward investing ADIs

Outward investing ADIs (ie Australian ADI entities with foreign investments) have the same requirement, but must also have capital to match certain other Australian assets. The minimum amount of equity capital for outward investing ADIs is the lesser of:

  • the safe harbour capital amount
  • a notional arm’s length capital amount, and
  • the worldwide capital amount. This allows an Australian ADI with foreign investments to fund its Australian investments with a minimum capital ratio equal to 100% of the Tier 1 capital ratio of its worldwide group.

Debt deduction creation rules

Besides the above tests that aim to limit the amount of debt deductions that entities can claim, additional debt deduction creation rules (or DDCRs) operate to bolster anti-avoidance provisions. Broadly speaking, the DDCRs in Subdiv 820-EAA aim to disallow deductions to the extent they are incurred in relation to debt creation schemes that lack genuine commercial justification. They apply to general class investors and non-ADI financial entities.

Div 820 significantly reformed in 2024

Division 820 as described above has been significantly reformed by Act No 23 of 2024. Interestingly, the changes in that Act do not apply to “Australian plantation forestry entities”, ie entities that solely or predominantly carry on a business of establishing and tending trees for felling in Australia (i146 of sch 2 to Act No 23 of 2024). For these specific entities, the old law in force immediately before the amendments in Act No 23 of 2024 on 1 July 2024 continues to apply.

Stay in the know with CCH iKnowConnect

Understanding the thin capitalisation provisions is essential for professionals advising multinational enterprises businesses on tax implications of debt/equity funding. This summary provides a foundational overview of the rules, but there is much more to consider.

CCH iKnowConnect offers detailed analysis and explanation of the rules to step you through to arrive at a correct outcome under Div 820, taking into consideration its interaction with numerous other tax law provisions.

CCH iKnowConnect’s flagship Income Tax module brings it altogether for you, including the CCH Master Tax Guide. Easily access all relevant legislation, court decisions and regulatory guidance, including the ATO’s edited private advice, to give you the full picture and gain more insights for your client’s situation.

Subscribe now to access comprehensive, professionally curated tax information tailored for accountants, lawyers, and tax advisors.

Cindy Chan
Senior Content Management Analyst, Wolters Kluwer
Cindy is a senior content management analyst. She writes and edits the research material in CCH iKnowConnect’s practice areas for Income tax and Tax treaties and agreements.
Back To Top