Best Practices for Evaluating FP&A Software
A structured evaluation process can help organizations identify the capabilities they need, build a business case, and select FP&A software that can support both current and future planning requirements.
1. Assess Your Current Environment
Start by reviewing your existing planning environment, including:
- Current budgeting and planning processes
- Spreadsheet usage
- Number and type of data sources
- Planning and forecasting cycle times
- Integration challenges
- Manual reconciliation requirements
- Reporting and analysis processes
- Existing system limitations
Understanding where the current environment creates delays, risks, or inefficiencies helps define future FP&A software requirements.
2. Identify Warning Signs
Common indicators that an organization may need to modernize its FP&A environment include:
- Heavy spreadsheet dependency
- Manual planning workflows
- Delayed forecasts
- Difficulty connecting financial plans with operational drivers
- Limited scenario and what-if capabilities
- Poor integration between systems
- Inconsistent planning assumptions
- Excessive IT support requirements
- Limited access to real-time reporting and analytics
- Difficulty scaling planning processes
Identifying these warning signs provides a clearer view of the cost and risk associated with maintaining existing processes.
3. Build a Cross-Functional Buying Committee
FP&A is no longer limited to the finance department. Financial planning is influenced by decisions across the enterprise, so successful software evaluations typically include input from:
- Finance leadership
- FP&A teams
- Operations
- Supply chain
- Sales and marketing
- HR
- IT
- Executive stakeholders
The buying committee should consider the organization's strategic objectives, FP&A priorities, planning challenges, data requirements, and opportunities for cross-functional alignment.
4. Define Business and Technical Requirements
Requirements should reflect both current needs and future planning priorities.
Consider:
- Functional FP&A capabilities
- Budgeting and forecasting requirements
- Scenario and modeling needs
- Reporting and analytics
- AI and predictive capabilities
- User experience
- Security requirements
- Integration needs
- Governance and auditability
- Scalability expectations
- Cross-functional planning requirements
Clear requirements help organizations distinguish essential capabilities from desirable features and create a more focused evaluation process.
5. Understand What's New in FP&A Software
Modern FP&A platforms are evolving beyond traditional budgeting and forecasting.
Key capabilities to consider include:
- Unified financial processes
- Predictive planning and forecasting
- Real-time reporting
- Group-level control with business-unit flexibility
- Integrated business planning
- Extended planning across functions
- AI-enabled analysis and automation
Integrated business planning can connect financial planning with areas such as supply, demand, workforce planning, and S&OP. Extended planning can expand this connected approach across functions including HR, sales, and operations.
The result is a more connected planning environment in which financial and operational decisions can be evaluated together.
6. Develop a Business Case
Organizations should compare the cost of maintaining current planning processes with the investment required to modernize them.
A business case should consider:
- Current technology and maintenance costs
- Overtime and manual work
- IT and training requirements
- Productivity impacts
- Risks associated with outdated processes
- Potential improvements in speed, accuracy, and agility
- Strategic benefits from improved planning
- Expected return on investment
- Total cost of ownership over three years
- The organization's three-, five-, and ten-year strategic goals
The cost of inaction can include slower decisions, lower agility, increased operational risk, technical debt, and difficulty attracting and retaining talent.
7. Research FP&A Software Vendors
Once requirements and the business case are established, organizations can begin researching FP&A software providers.
Consider:
- Vendor experience and longevity
- Experience supporting organizations of similar size and complexity
- Analyst research
- Customer recommendations
- Product demonstrations
- Implementation capabilities
- Global support
- Product roadmap
- AI and predictive planning capabilities
Independent research from organizations such as Gartner, Nucleus Research, and Dresner Advisory Services can provide additional context during the evaluation process.
8. Build an FP&A Software RFP
An RFP provides a structured way to evaluate potential providers against the requirements defined by the buying committee.
Questions may address:
- Experience supporting enterprise finance organizations
- Implementations for organizations of similar size and complexity
- Company stability
- Global support capabilities
- Implementation and customer success resources
- Integration with existing technology
- Governance and audit capabilities
- AI roadmap
- Scalability
- Support for acquisitions and changing planning requirements
A well-defined RFP helps organizations compare solutions against their specific business, functional, and technical requirements.