81% of hospital leaders believe that drug diversion occurs and is largely undetected, posing risks to patient safety and organizational compliance, as well as nurses’ well-being. Drug diversion interviews must balance compliance with uncovering incidents and supporting recovery.
The interview is a key part of the drug diversion investigation. In this article, we set the stage for the interview, asking the key questions to find out what happened, but also infusing the process with empathy and care. Using this drug diversion investigation checklist, you can prepare for and conduct the interviews effectively, learn how to look for behavioral cues leading to key moments throughout the interview that lead to more productive outcomes, and avoid common pitfalls that may hinder the investigation.
Drug diversion investigation checklist
Each section of this piece will dive deeper into how to prepare, conduct, and follow up on your drug diversion investigation questions, but at the core of every investigation is the interview. Here is the basic checklist of what you want to achieve in your interview.
- Clearly and confidently explain why you are interviewing the person suspected of diversion
- Provide minimal time for the individual suspected of diversion to prepare for the interview
- Less warning often results in more genuine reactions to questions
- Allow suspect to explain or justify actions, observing gaps in explanation
- Return to the gaps in the suspect’s story, directing the questions back to the inconsistencies
- Be aware of body language and indicators of deception or escalation
- Present choices (“fork in the road moment”) and reiterate the purpose of interview
- Explain next steps and conclude with documentation
The two most essential elements of any investigation are finding out the truth and rooting the entire process in compassion. Drug diversion has multiple victims: the patient and the person diverting. If you can gather the truth as indicated by the evidence and keep your approach centered on healing, you can balance empathy and effectiveness. This will help you keep compassion for the people you care about, and stay compliant with regulatory requirements.
Interviews versus interrogations
Because it is often referred to as a drug diversion investigation, there is already a negative connotation to the act. We never want the suspected diverter to feel interrogated. However, when it is time to speak with them, you have to borrow elements from a standard interview and an interrogation. An interview is a dialogue that seeks to gather information, and most importantly, it is non-accusatory, informal, and intent on understanding the situation. An interrogation aims to confirm your suspicions and is conducted to confirm guilt; it is accusatory and a formal process.
At its core, your interview should include the intent to establish the facts surrounding the incident and create an environment that encourages transparency and honesty. However, drug diversion can have a significant impact on your organization. The stakes are high. There are risks to patients and staff, as well as regulatory implications and potential inspections. Due to the gravity of the situation, the dialogue must still center around confirming what the data and evidence suggest. Due to the confrontational manner of this conversation, it is recommended that you take a more formal approach and pick a location that will be conducive to this conversation.